· 10/29/2001
In Re Best Lock Corp. Shareholder Litigation
Citations
- 845 A.2d 1057
- 2001 Del. Ch. LEXIS 134
- 2001 WL 1398580
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the rule in Bershad precluded recovery in a minority squeeze out transaction
- holding that isolated misstatement contradicted by information statement when read as a whole was not material
- considering acquiescence in the context of a corporate transaction and describing the need to show “unequivocal approval” of the transaction
- “Delaware courts have held repeatedly that a board need not disclose specific details of the analysis underlying a financial advisor‟s opinion.”
- “Majority shareholders who elect to freeze out minority shareholders should not be made better off by choosing to forego protective structural mechanisms. . . . [A]cquiescence (or ratification implied from the actions of shareholders
- “Majority shareholders who elect to freeze out minority shareholders should not be made better off by choosing to forego protective structural mechanisms. . . . [A]cquiescence (or ratification implied from the actions of shareholders
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.