Skip to main content

In Re Best Lock Corp. Shareholder Litigation

Citations

  • 845 A.2d 1057
  • 2001 Del. Ch. LEXIS 134
  • 2001 WL 1398580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the rule in Bershad precluded recovery in a minority squeeze out transaction
  • holding that isolated misstatement contradicted by information statement when read as a whole was not material
  • considering acquiescence in the context of a corporate transaction and describing the need to show “unequivocal approval” of the transaction
  • “Delaware courts have held repeatedly that a board need not disclose specific details of the analysis underlying a financial advisor‟s opinion.”
  • “Majority shareholders who elect to freeze out minority shareholders should not be made better off by choosing to forego protective structural mechanisms. . . . [A]cquiescence (or ratification implied from the actions of shareholders
  • “Majority shareholders who elect to freeze out minority shareholders should not be made better off by choosing to forego protective structural mechanisms. . . . [A]cquiescence (or ratification implied from the actions of shareholders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.