S.D. Georgia· 10/7/1975
Schnorbach v. Fuqua
Citations
- 70 F.R.D. 424
- 21 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 924
- 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a major corporate restructuring was not found notwithstanding the fact that, among other things, the shareholder’s equity interest increased by 9 percent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alaimo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. Comed, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1980-04-16· cited 62×
- Helfand v. Cenco, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1977-10-17· cited 38×
- Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.D. Delaware· 1978-07-12· cited 35×
- Youngman v. TahmoushCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1983-01-05· cited 31×
- FMC Corp. v. BoeskyN.D. Illinois· 1989-11-07· cited 25×
- Watts v. Des Moines Register and TribuneS.D. Iowa· 1981-11-17· cited 24×
- Unnamed caseEleventh Circuit· 1986-12-16· cited 21×
- Gibb v. Delta Drilling Co.N.D. Texas· 1984-12-12· cited 19×
- Jacobs v. Pabst Brewing Co.D. Delaware· 1982-10-07· cited 16×
- Bastian v. Lakefront Realty Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1978-08-09· cited 14×
- Cooper v. Pacific Life InsuranceS.D. Georgia· 2005-05-09· cited 12×
- Wilson v. Great American Industries, Inc.N.D. New York· 1982-03-12· cited 11×
- Hastings-Murtagh v. Texas Air Corp.S.D. Florida· 1988-02-29· cited 10×
- Efros v. Nationwide Corp.S.D. Ohio· 1983-08-05· cited 9×
- Pacemaker Plastics Co., Inc. v. AFM Corp.N.D. Ohio· 2001-04-03· cited 2×
- Ziemack v. Centel Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1995-12-19· cited 2×
- Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc. v. FisherS.D. Texas· 2016-01-21· cited 1×
- Bastian v. Lakefront Realty CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1978-08-09
- Davis v. Comed, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1980-07-08
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 1,683×
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court· 1940-11-12· cited 1,544×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 764×
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Second Circuit· 1968-12-09· cited 440×
- Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 428×
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielThird Circuit· 1970-06-08· cited 418×
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Second Circuit· 1967-03-13· cited 350×
- Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court· 1967-12-04· cited 214×
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaS.D. New York· 1968-01-22· cited 172×
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Second Circuit· 1972-03-06· cited 170×
- Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc.Third Circuit· 1972-03-31· cited 155×
- Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanSecond Circuit· 1967-08-14· cited 154×
- Palmer v. ChamberlinFifth Circuit· 1951-09-12· cited 121×
- American Federation of Musicians v. CarrollSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 106×
- Free World Foreign Cars, Inc. v. Alfa Romeo, S.p.A.S.D. New York· 1972-04-08· cited 92×
- duPont v. WylyD. Delaware· 1973-12-28· cited 90×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,481 Hilda Herbst v. International Telephone and Telegraph CorporationSecond Circuit· 1974-04-03· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.