Young v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that second or successive Rule 3.850 petitions are not permitted “absent allegations of newly discovered evidence or a new constitutional right”
• successive claims properly barred absent allegations of newly discovered evidence or new constitutional right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• George v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-11· cited 2×
• Tippins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-17
• Maldonado v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-14
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-25
• Hough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-20
• Moriarty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 320×
• Rose v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-03-07· cited 121×
• Maharaj v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-19· cited 81×
• Pope v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-04· cited 34×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-19· cited 1×