Young v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court went “astray” by concluding that there was no similarity between the prior crime and charged crime, explaining that the correct rule is that there must be a sufficient connection between the prior act and the crime charged
• finding that the trial court went “astray” by concluding that there was no similarity between the prior crime and charged crime, explaining that the correct rule is that there must be a sufficient connection between the prior act and the crime charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peoples v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-03-28· cited 75×
• Merritt v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-09-28· cited 41×
• Goodman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-05-06· cited 15×
• Young v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-01-09· cited 11×
• Newsome v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-28· cited 10×
• Evans v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-21· cited 10×
• Richard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-09-04· cited 7×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• Cawthon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1904-02-12· cited 174×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-03-02· cited 107×
• Grier v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-01-22· cited 104×
• Gardner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-05-07· cited 61×
• Morgan v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-01-13· cited 37×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-02-08· cited 27×
• Chisholm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-09-08· cited 11×
• Cummings v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-03-19· cited 10×