Skip to main content

Merritt v. State

Citations

  • 683 S.E.2d 855
  • 285 Ga. 778
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3071
  • 2009 Ga. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing conviction for tampering with evidence in the defendant’s own case where the evidence of intent to frustrate that prosecution was insufficient
  • “OCGA § 16-10-94 (a) clearly states that intent is a necessary element of the crime. . . .”
  • “[The circumstantial evidence] need not exclude every conceivable inference or hypothesis — only those that are reasonable.”
  • “[The circumstantial evidence] need not exclude every conceivable inference or hypothesis – only those that are reasonable.”
  • mere repositioning of victim’s body insufficient to show perpetrator intended to frustrate his apprehension or obstruct the prosecution
  • “[The circumstantial evidence] need not exclude every conceivable inference or hypothesis — only those that are reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.