Skip to main content
D. Connecticut· 3/13/2014

Young v. Choinski

Citations

  • 15 F. Supp. 3d 172
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32568
  • 2014 WL 962237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate his wounds were a serious medical need in part because the plaintiff did not allege the wounds “significantly interfered with his daily activities or caused him substantial or chronic pain”
  • noting that “case law within this Circuit recognizes that depression combined with severe anxiety attacks or suicide attempts is a serious medical need” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • explaining that supervisory official can be personally involved in a constitutional violation if the violation is ongoing and he takes no corrective action but is not personally involved if he learns of the violation after-the-fact
  • collecting cases and finding that plaintiff’s sworn complaint and deposition testimony constituted evidence sufficient to consider for summary judgment purposes
  • collecting cases for the proposition that abrasions with minor bleeding do not constitute a “serious medical need”
  • failure of prison official to respond to inmate request insufficient to show personal involvement in Eighth Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Young v. Choinski

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.