Skip to main content

York v. State

Citations

  • 891 So. 2d 569
  • 2004 WL 2724838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that appellate counsel should have “filed a motion to file a supplemental brief” to address the impact of cases not available when counsel filed the initial brief
  • appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise issue on direct appeal as fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casanueva

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.