Barber v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate counsel was ineffective in not raising issue that convictions for both theft and dealing in stolen property were prohibited by § 812.025

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Riley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-22· cited 11×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-27· cited 3×
• KABLITZ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-10· cited 1×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-15· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Wilson v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-15· cited 99×
• Downs v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 69×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-09-05· cited 46×
• Ortiz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-01· cited 23×
• Toson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-14· cited 18×
• York v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-01· cited 16×
• Barfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 16×
• Kilmartin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-08· cited 16×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 14×
• Johnson v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-18· cited 5×
• Hollinger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-30· cited 2×