· 3/2/2010
WTG Gas Processing, L.P. v. ConocoPhillips Co.
Citations
- 309 S.W.3d 635
- 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1872
- 2010 WL 695801
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing a bidding procedure which stated that “[a] Proposal will only be deemed to be accepted upon the execution and delivery . . . of a [Purchase and Sale Agreement]”
- “A ‘meeting of the minds’ is ‘merely a mutuality subpart of the offer and acceptance elements.’ ” (quoting Domingo v. Mitchell, 257 S.W.3d 34, 40 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2008, pet. denied))
- “Morgan Stanley and ConocoPhillips will evaluate the IOIs and invite a limited number of bidders . . . [and] will narrow the number of bidders and enter into final PSA negotiations.” (emphasis added)
- “Morgan Stanley and ConocoPhillips will evaluate the IOIs and invite a limited number of bidders . . . [and] will narrow the number of bidders and enter into final PSA negotiations.” (emphasis added)
- whether parties intended to enter into binding agreement is often question of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles W. Seymore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.