Skip to main content
· 3/2/2010

WTG Gas Processing, L.P. v. ConocoPhillips Co.

Citations

  • 309 S.W.3d 635
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1872
  • 2010 WL 695801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing a bidding procedure which stated that “[a] Proposal will only be deemed to be accepted upon the execution and delivery . . . of a [Purchase and Sale Agreement]”
  • “A ‘meeting of the minds’ is ‘merely a mutuality subpart of the offer and acceptance elements.’ ” (quoting Domingo v. Mitchell, 257 S.W.3d 34, 40 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2008, pet. denied))
  • “Morgan Stanley and ConocoPhillips will evaluate the IOIs and invite a limited number of bidders . . . [and] will narrow the number of bidders and enter into final PSA negotiations.” (emphasis added)
  • “Morgan Stanley and ConocoPhillips will evaluate the IOIs and invite a limited number of bidders . . . [and] will narrow the number of bidders and enter into final PSA negotiations.” (emphasis added)
  • whether parties intended to enter into binding agreement is often question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles W. Seymore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.