Arcadian Phosphates, Inc., Judas Azuelos, and Eli Sivan v. Arcadian Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he language of the [writing] . . . shows that [the parties] did not intend to be bound.”
• holding that, despite “considerable partial performance,” there was no contract where the parties had clearly manifested an intent not to be bound absent a final written agreement
• holding “reference to a binding sales agreement to be completed at some future date” is evidence of a present intent not to be bound
• finding that where neither party negotiated for language stating a clear commitment, neither party evidenced an intent to be bound by its terms
• noting that a “factual question arises when intent cannot be determined from [the relevant] agreement”
• holding “reference to a binding sales agreement to be completed at some future date” is evidence of a present intent not to be bound

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).