District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/27/1989
Wright v. State
Citations
- 547 So. 2d 258
- 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1781
- 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4278
- 1989 WL 84056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant not given opportunity to withdraw plea on remand because, unlike Morgan, no stipulation existed, the defendant knowing “that the state refused to agree to dispositiveness”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nimmons, Thompson, Wentworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vaughn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-31· cited 16×
- Helms v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-04· cited 9×
- Fernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-06· cited 6×
- Maxwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-06· cited 6×
- Beermunder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-18· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Florida· 1971-01-06· cited 186×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-06-14· cited 169×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-29· cited 27×
- Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-01· cited 26×
- Hardison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-09· cited 12×
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-01· cited 7×
- Puccio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-15· cited 6×
- Sune v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.