Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/20/1978
Wright v. State
Citations
- 571 S.W.2d 24
- 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that jury charges need not define phrases that are commonly understood that present a fact issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Odom, Vollers, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-16· cited 150×
- Butcher, Charles E. IiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-28· cited 94×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-10· cited 91×
- Teer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-24· cited 56×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1986-08-29· cited 23×
- Ex Parte GutierrezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 23×
- Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-12-29· cited 17×
- Thornburg v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-10-31· cited 11×
- Arevalo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1988-04-27· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-08-22· cited 3×
- Arevalo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-27· cited 1×
- David Kitzmiller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-07-24
- Michael Del Anthony Arpaia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-04-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.