Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 446 So. 2d 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel was ineffective in having the defendant testify he had five prior felony convictions when he had no prior felony convictions
  • granting post-conviction relief where counsel elicited testimony that defendant was previously convicted of five crimes when convictions were only misdemeanors
  • remanding for new trial when defense counsel elicited five otherwise inadmissible misdemeanor convictions in direct examination
  • granting postconviction relief when defense counsel elicited testimony that defendant had been previously convicted of five crimes when the convictions were only misdemeanors that did not involve dishonesty or false statement and thus were inadmissible
  • finding prejudice where jury heard number of defendant’s inadmissible misdemeanor convictions because of “extremely prejudicial nature of this type of evidence” and “strong and emphatic emphasis placed upon it by the state attorney in attacking the defendant’s credibility in final argument”
  • counsel’s performance was rendered ineffective by introducing harmful and inadmissible evidence concerning defendant’s prior convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Barkdull and Hubbart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.