Ridenour v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for new trial where trial counsel elicited testimony about nonexistent “prior conviction”
• counsel held ineffective for failing to object to impeachment evidence of prior felony conviction where adjudication was withheld
• “In light of the credibility contest 14 between the defendant and the victims, we must conclude that Mr. Ridenour met his burden of showing a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Skrandel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-13· cited 3×
• Chester v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-11· cited 2×
• Miranda v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-03
• Caleb Fernandez v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-12-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Barber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-07· cited 20×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-28· cited 14×
• Roesch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17· cited 7×
• Ridenour v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-25· cited 1×