Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/6/1991
Wright v. State
Citations
- 598 A.2d 1214
- 89 Md. App. 604
- 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 240
- 1991 WL 255206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Spence and explaining that “the State was setting [the witness] up as a proverbial straw man, so that on examination the State could knock [him] down with hearsay statements previously made by him”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alpert, Bloom, Wenner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-12· cited 33×
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-08· cited 17×
- Nance v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-01· cited 8×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-31· cited 8×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-31· cited 5×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Scarborough v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-04· cited 37×
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-23· cited 35×
- Beghtol v. MichaelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-29· cited 18×
- Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-08· cited 13×
- Joiner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-03-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.