Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 598 A.2d 1214
  • 89 Md. App. 604
  • 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 240
  • 1991 WL 255206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Spence and explaining that “the State was setting [the witness] up as a proverbial straw man, so that on examination the State could knock [him] down with hearsay statements previously made by him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alpert, Bloom, Wenner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.