Bradley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Impeachment” is “a shield” that “protects a party from unfavorable testimony,” not “a sword to place otherwise inadmissible evidence before the jury”
• “in instances where a witness’s testimony is not reasonably divisible into clearly separate areas of inquiry, the State may properly impeach any portion of the witness’s testimony that disfavors the government’s case” (citations omitted)
• “Impeachment may be thought of as a shield [which] ... protects a party from unfavorable testimony by neutralizing that testimony ... [and] should not be used as a sword to place otherwise inadmissible evidence before the jury....”
• \Impeachment may be thought of as a shield [which] ... protects a party from unfavorable testimony by neutralizing that testimony ... [and] should not be used as a sword to place otherwise inadmissible evidence before the jury....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Simms
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
• Dorsey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 32×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-17· cited 25×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-12· cited 20×
• Johnson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-04-10· cited 18×
• Marlin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-30· cited 15×
• State v. Richards
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-23· cited 12×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-24· cited 8×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-31· cited 8×
• Pickett v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-03· cited 6×
• Tuer v. McDonald
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-06· cited 6×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-31· cited 5×
• Goldberg v. Boone
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-03-01· cited 4×
• McClain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-21· cited 4×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-07· cited 2×
• Foreman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-04· cited 2×

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Arizona v. Fulminante
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
• Dorsey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
• United States v. Roland W. Brown
  D.C. Circuit· 1974-01-10· cited 216×
• United States v. Theodore D. Morlang
  Fourth Circuit· 1975-12-30· cited 172×
• United States v. Clinton Webster
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-05-09· cited 116×
• United States v. Eisen
  Second Circuit· 1992-08-17· cited 112×
• McKnight v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-06· cited 101×
• United States v. Barry Kendall Hogan, and Mark Bradford Hogan
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-08-29· cited 99×
• State v. Kidd
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-18· cited 94×
• United States v. Vincent Delillo, David Francis and Clearview Concrete Products Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1980-05-08· cited 83×
• Beales v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-05· cited 81×
• Nance v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-23· cited 78×
• Jefferson-El v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-06· cited 61×
• Rainville v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-11-06· cited 55×
• United States v. Kenneth Kane
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-10-02· cited 49×
• United States v. Emilano Gomez-Gallardo
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-10-02· cited 48×
• State v. Gage
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 48×
• State v. Rufener
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-03-04· cited 31×
• Poole v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-21· cited 27×