Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 705 So. 2d 102
  • 1998 WL 17388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant is entitled to jury instruction on his theory of case if there is any evidence to support it, no matter how flimsy that evidence might be
  • stating that a criminal defendant is entitled to have a jury instruction on his theory of defense if there is any evidence supporting his theory
  • stating that criminal defendant is entitled to have jury instruction on his theory of defense if there is any evidence supporting his theory
  • a lack of memory does not irreconcilably disprove a self-defense claim so instruction on justifiable use of non-deadly force should be given if requested
  • “Inconsistencies in defenses are permitted so long as the proof of one does not necessarily disprove the other.”
  • error to deny jury instruction, which allowed person to defend herself against officer “to the extent that she reasonably believes such force is necessary” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.