District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/19/1996
Wright v. State
Citations
- 675 So. 2d 1009
- 1996 WL 332338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allegation that counsel failed to investigate valid defenses, coupled with claim that had counsel done so defendant would not have pleaded, constitutes facially sufficient ineffectiveness claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sampson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-20· cited 12×
- Stanley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-10· cited 9×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-04· cited 8×
- Straitwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-15· cited 7×
- Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-02· cited 5×
- Whitty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-22· cited 3×
- Sosataquechel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-02· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-06· cited 103×
- Chestnut v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-05· cited 92×
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-18· cited 22×
- Brunson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-12· cited 15×
- Shaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-01· cited 3×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.