Scott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plea agreement or colloquy showing client approval of counsel will not refute an allegation that defendant later learned of the availability of a defense about which counsel failed to advise him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-06· cited 11×
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-08· cited 4×
• Vice v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-06
• Calhoun v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-18· cited 22×
• Frazier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-14· cited 15×
• Brunson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-12· cited 15×
• Stanley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-10· cited 9×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-19· cited 8×
• Arreola v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-02· cited 6×
• Whitty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-22· cited 3×