Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing general jury qualification from jury qualification to try a specific case and holding that general qualification process is not critical stage requiring the defendant’s presence
• distinguishing general qualification of the jury from the qualification of a jury to try a specific case and holding that general qualification process is not a critical stage of the proceedings requiring the defendant’s presence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Irby
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 170×
• Muhammad v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-18· cited 153×
• Blackwood v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-12-21· cited 70×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-02· cited 45×
• Orme v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-24· cited 37×
• Barwick v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-30· cited 30×
• Wike v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-24· cited 22×
• Turner v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-05-20· cited 20×
• Pooler v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-06· cited 15×
• State Of Washington v. Joel A. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coney v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 135×
• Hardwick v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-09-08· cited 64×
• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-28· cited 55×
• Maulden v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 42×
• Remeta v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-31· cited 26×
• Blakely v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-05-03· cited 12×