Skip to main content

Wright v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 391 S.W.3d 743
  • 2012 Ky. LEXIS 496
  • 2012 WL 5274736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although Appellant admits this error was not properly preserved for review, he is correct in his assertion that this issue may be presented for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Cunningham, Minton, Noble, Schroder, Scott, Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.