Skip to main content

Worley v. State

Citations

  • 265 Ga. 251
  • 454 S.E.2d 461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plain meaning of a former version of the sentencing statute, OCGA § 17-10-1 (a), did not prevent a trial court from imposing a sentence of life imprisonment for armed robbery, whether or not the offender was sentenced as a recidivist
  • interpreting effect of language in OCGA § 17-10-1 as rewritten by the Code Revision Committee
  • claiming sentencing statute required determinate term between five and twenty years
  • rejecting argument that person convicted of armed robbery must be given sentence for a determinate number of years rather than a life sentence unless he is sentenced to life as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7
  • “[T] he armed robbery statute clearly specifies that a person convicted of armed robbery can be sentenced to prison for life ”
  • “[T]he armed robbery statute clearly specifies that a person convicted of armed robbery can be sentenced to prison for life or a determinate term between five and 20 years[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Carley, Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.