Skip to main content

Cottingham v. State

Citations

  • 424 S.E.2d 794
  • 206 Ga. App. 197
  • 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2497
  • 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adherence to policy in determination of matter within court’s discretion amounts to refusal to exercise discretion and abdication of judicial responsibility
  • standard for reviewing denial of directed verdict of acquittal is same as for reviewing sufficiency of evidence
  • “Because of the broad discretion in sentencing vested in trial courts, it is the duty of the courts to exercise that discretion as to all aspects of sentences they impose.”
  • mechanical sentencing an abdication of judicial responsibility for refusal to exercise discretionary sentencing authority
  • use of mechanical sentencing formula is abdication of judicial responsibility
  • use of mechanical sentencing formula is abdication of judicial responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Carley, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.