Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 523 S.E.2d 857
  • 271 Ga. 686
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4158
  • 1999 Ga. LEXIS 951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an illegal sentence may benefit a criminal defendant but that a judgment imposing a sentence that the law does not allow is still void and that the trial court may resentence the defendant at any time, citing Hartman v. State, 266 Ga. 613 (5) (469 SE2d 163) (1996
  • “a direct appeal should lie from the denial of a motion attacking a sentence on the ground that it is void”
  • a direct appeal lies from the denial of a motion attacking a sentence on the grounds that the sentence is void
  • “[T]he denial of a petition to correct a sentence on the ground that the original sentence was void is appealable as a matter of right.”
  • “[T]he denial of a petition to correct a sentence on the ground that the original sentence was void is appealable as a matter of right.”
  • \[T]he denial of a petition to correct a sentence on the ground that the original sentence was void is appealable as a matter of right.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.