Woodson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that trespasser lacked standing to claim protection of the Fourth Amendment in premises from which he had been barred
• “We hold that appellant was not lawfully on the premises and that, as a trespasser, he lacks the privacy interest necessary to claim a Fourth Amendment violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).