District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/14/1999
Crump v. State
Citations
- 746 So. 2d 558
- 1999 WL 1136654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that the statutory language was unconstitutionally vague
- concluding that defendant failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that the statutory language was unconstitutionally vague
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chambers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-11· cited 33×
- Dickerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-30· cited 10×
- Branch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-21· cited 8×
- Nichols v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-12· cited 1×
- Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 1×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-26
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-26· cited 146×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-01· cited 43×
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-09· cited 38×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-05· cited 24×
- Waterman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.