Wood v. Tompkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1396n(c)(2)(C) “give[s] rise to enforceable rights”
• finding no implied foreclosure because Medicaid provisions \are no more comprehensive now than they were in Wilder.\
• collecting cases that synthesize Suter with prior precedent represented by Wilder
• “waiver[s] save[ ] both the state and the federal government money, because home care is often less expensive than institutional care”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).