Skip to main content
· 10/4/1995

Marshall v. Switzer

Citations

  • 900 F. Supp. 604
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15146
  • 1995 WL 603707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “These two cases illustrate the fact that the Rehabilitation Act established a right to the provision of individualized services.”
  • “Actions involving claims for prospective declaratory or injunctive relief are permissible provided the official against whom the action is brought has a direct connection to, or responsibility for, the alleged illegal action.”
  • “Actions involving claims for prospective declaratory or injunctive relief are permissible provided the official against whom the action is brought has a direct connection to, or responsibility for, the alleged illegal action.”
  • “Actions involving claims for prospective declaratory or injunctive relief are permissible provided the official against whom the action is brought has a direct connection to, or responsibility for, the alleged illegal action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scullin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.