Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/7/2003

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hickey

Citations

  • 322 F.3d 1123
  • 2003 WL 834700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “the purging of the contempt ordinarily renders the controversy moot”
  • recognizing that “the purging of the contempt ordinarily renders the controversy moot”
  • holding that “[d]istrict courts have broad equitable power to order appropriate relief in civil contempt proceedings” (citing McComb v. 23 Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 193 (1949)). 22 United States v. United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 304 (1947
  • observing that ownership is a prerequisite to alter ego liability, and consequently rejecting the argument that that an individual need not own any part of a corporation for an alter ego relationship to exist
  • approving an asset freeze to secure payment of a contempt sanction as within the court’s equitable powers
  • upholding the district court’s exercise of jurisdiction over a corporation nominally owned by the defen- dant’s mother and into which the defendant had channeled proceeds of his securities law violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Hawkins, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hickey

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.