California Supreme Court· 12/16/1947
Tannhauser v. Adams
Citations
- 31 Cal. 2d 169
- 187 P.2d 716
- 5 A.L.R. 2d 1015
- 1947 Cal. LEXIS 229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute of limitations for second action was not tolled because plaintiff did not diligently pursue first action, which was dismissed for lack of prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 514×
- Retail Clerks Union Local 648, Afl-Cio v. Hub Pharmacy, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1983-06-07· cited 103×
- Wood v. Elling Corp.California Supreme Court· 1977-12-30· cited 101×
- People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 90×
- Sierra Club, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-07-27· cited 55×
- Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court· 1967-02-15· cited 52×
- Salazar v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-05-01· cited 35×
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-12-23· cited 34×
- Helvey v. SaxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-11-13· cited 30×
- Elbert, Ltd. v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-08-14· cited 30×
- Wing v. WingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-15· cited 23×
- Sears v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-11-15· cited 20×
- McCaslin v. HamblenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-05-15· cited 16×
- Philbrick v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-07-30· cited 16×
- Mayer v. L&B REAL ESTATECalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-06-16· cited 13×
- Sheeter v. LifurCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-10-20· cited 11×
- Edwards v. City of Santa PaulaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-01-10· cited 10×
- McMaster v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-08-31· cited 10×
- Paul v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-02-14· cited 9×
- Hu v. Silgan Containers Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1999-03-26· cited 7×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-12-06· cited 171×
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals· 1900-03-27· cited 83×
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 62×
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-06-27· cited 52×
- Munson v. MarksSupreme Court of Colorado· 1912-04-01· cited 44×
- Elliott v. ClementOregon Supreme Court· 1944-09-19· cited 29×
- Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court· 1913-08-01· cited 29×
- Rand v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-10-09· cited 28×
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. MasonColorado Court of Appeals· 1912-07-08· cited 26×
- Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-06-08· cited 22×
- Small v. HullMontana Supreme Court· 1934-04-14· cited 18×
- Davault v. EssigCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-07-24· cited 15×
- Farrar v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-11-15· cited 15×
- Ostrander v. . DarlingNew York Court of Appeals· 1891-05-01· cited 8×
- Eastland v. Yazoo Delta Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1907-03-15· cited 5×
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. WoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-03-04· cited 4×
- Clifford v. Hyde CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-11-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.