Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 12/16/2011

Wolfson v. Bruno

Citations

  • 844 F. Supp. 2d 348
  • 2011 WL 6328215
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where the parties’ briefs “assume that New York law controls,” such “implied consent” is sufficient to establish choice of law
  • same for pro se litigants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.