Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing contribution where two joint tortfeasors were liable under different theories of tort liability
• “It is clear that there should be no liability for failing to warn someone of a risk or hazard which he appreciated to the same extent as a warning would have provided”
• “In determining whether a particular statutory action supports a claim for contribution under M.G.L.c. 23 IB, a court must look to whether the underlying claim is in essence, a tort claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).