Glicklich v. Spievack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing grant of judgment n.o.v. for defendant where physician’s follow-up plan was inadequate
• evidence that mother of nine year old plaintiff prepared child’s meals, discussed his day with him, read him stories, and generally took an interest in his play, school, and friends
• in medical malpractice case, “[pjrecise evidence as to the ‘staging’ of the cancer is not required . . .”
• evidence that causal connection between negligence and damage “is possible, conceivable, or reasonable, without more, is insufficient to meet [AIC’s] burden” on causation
• “the case is a close one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).