James C. Gardner v. Q. H. S., Inc., a Corporation, and J. M. Fields, Inc., a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the duty to warn arises when the user may not realize the potential danger of a product
• finding that the duty-to-warn arises when the user may not realize the potential danger of a product
• noting that, in the products liability context, “[w]here the issue is one of foreseeability, evidence of what has actually been experienced in the same or comparable situations constitutes proof of the greatest probative value”
• action by apartment house owner against manufacturer of hair rollers purchased by plaintiff’s tenant after rollers ignited and burned down plaintiff’s building
• action by apartment house owner against manufacturer of hair rollers purchased by plaintiff's tenant after rollers ignited and burned down plaintiff's building
• “the separate theories of negligence and breach of warranty [for failure to provide adequate warning of hidden danger] are not always coextensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).