Skip to main content
· 8/2/2007

Wojchowski v. Daines

Citations

  • 498 F.3d 99
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18342
  • 2007 WL 2199024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that New York’s attribution of an institutionalized spouse’s Social Security benefits to a non-institutionalized spouse for the purpose of Medicaid budgeting does not violate § 407(a)
  • finding that New York’s attribution of an institutionalized spouse’s Social Security benefits to a non-institutionalized spouse for the purpose of Medicaid budgeting does not violate § 407(a)
  • acknowledging that the Second Circuit's previous “expansive” interpretation of the phrase “other legal process” in Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. DeBuono, 218 F.3d 197 (2d Cir.2000), was incompatible with the restrictive reading of that phrase in Keffeler
  • acknowledging that the Second Circuit's previous \expansive\ interpretation of the phrase \other legal process\ in Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. DeBuono, 218 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2000), was incompatible with the restrictive reading of that phrase in Keffeler
  • overruling, based on Keffeler , Second Circuit precedent that threats are \other legal process\
  • overruling, based on Keffeler, Second Circuit precedent that threats are “other legal process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Raggi, Berman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.