Fourth Circuit· 1/27/2010

Winston v. Kelly

Citations

592 F.3d 535
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1845
2010 WL 310098

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “when a state court forecloses further development of the factual record, it passes up the opportunity that exhaustion ensures.”
observing that the Supreme Court of Virginia \was unconvinced by Winston’s evidence concerning the Flynn effect and [the standard error of measurement]” and opining that \a federal court sitting in habeas could not conclude that such a holding violated [AEDPA]”
rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on trial counsel’s strategy to attack witness’s credibility rather than call other witnesses
\[T]he materiality element of a Brady claim requires a collective assessment of whether introduction of the exculpatory evidence might have affected the outcome of the trial.\
‘AEDPA deference under § 2254(e)(1), however, will be appropriate to any relevant factual findings made by the Virginia Supreme Court.”’
“AEDPA deference under § 2254(e)(1), however, will be appropriate to any relevant factual findings made by the Virginia Supreme Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael, Gregory, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Winston v. Kelly

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.