Jerome Gordon v. Daniel Braxton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a habeas petitioner satisfies the “fairly presents” requirement where the state court is presented with “both the operative facts and the controlling legal principles”
• “the state court’s decision must qualify as an ‘adjudicat[ion] on the merits’ to trigger AEDPA deference.”
• “A habeas petitioner meets the exhaustion requirement by ‘fairly present[ing]’ his claim in each appropriate state court ..., thereby alerting that court to the federal nature of the claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).