Garuti v. Roden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner’s non-specific and conclusory allegations about 1 his counsel, who had refused to furnish an affidavit, were insufficient to raise a 2 substantial issue
• asserting that Cullen “essentially” overruled Winston I
• “Conclusory allegations are insufficient to raise a substantial factual issue” requiring development in a habeas proceeding
• a statute-of-limitations defense, if “apparent from the face of the 24 complaint,” may properly be raised in a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).