Winegar v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that check deception conviction was admissible under Evidence Rule 609 because “[p]roof of the elements of check deception would seem to be indicative of dishonesty”
• holding that conversion, as a lesser included offense of theft, is a crime of dishonesty, and thus, a conviction for conversion may be admissible for impeachment purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Kenneth Kane
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-10-02· cited 49×
• Sweet v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-14· cited 35×
• Decker v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-11-30· cited 18×
• Lepard v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-22· cited 12×
• Harold E. Chastain v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-10-16
• Georgia Ann Miller v. Tran, M.D. Trinh
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2025-02-26

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Ashton v. Anderson
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-02-28· cited 210×
• Burton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-02-26· cited 106×
• Grassmyer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-28· cited 59×
• Fletcher v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-01-29· cited 40×
• Long v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 36×
• Burkes v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-03-08· cited 32×
• McDaniel v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-05-12· cited 23×
• Millican v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-08-23· cited 16×
• Solomon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-09-01· cited 11×
• Wells v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-12-03· cited 7×
• Franklin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1974-08-01· cited 6×
• Bumgardner v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-07-14· cited 4×