Franklin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[The Miranda case requires that the precautionary warnings clearly express that an individual has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Solomon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-09-01· cited 11×
• Fraley v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-02-20· cited 7×
• Winegar v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-10-26· cited 6×
• State of Indiana v. DeAngelo Banks
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-01-23· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Jones v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1969-12-05· cited 89×
• Goodloe v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1969-12-09· cited 27×
• Holguin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-05-05· cited 14×