District of Columbia· 9/30/2007
Winder v. Erste
Citations
- 511 F. Supp. 2d 160
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72655
- 2007 WL 2822579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting also that “the elements of a prima facie case are the same under both the federal and the DC FMLA . . . .”
- collecting cases and finding that “employment interests are not protected by substantive due process[,]” but declining to decide the plaintiff’s claim on that ground
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Winder v. ErsteD.C. Circuit· 2009-05-15· cited 82×
- Sewell v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2008-02-01· cited 59×
- Roseboro v. BillingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-31· cited 39×
- Elkins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-12-12· cited 22×
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-19· cited 20×
- Payne v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2008-12-30· cited 19×
- ['DAVIS v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY']District of Columbia· 2014-03-20· cited 19×
- Toms v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-03· cited 15×
- Butler v. District of Columbia Housing Finance AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2009-01-06· cited 13×
- Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-07-10· cited 12×
- Omokehinde v. Detroit Board of EducationE.D. Michigan· 2008-06-12· cited 11×
- Smith v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-21· cited 10×
- Holloway v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict of Columbia· 2013-12-30· cited 10×
- Elkins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2010-02-12· cited 9×
- Elkins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2010-05-03· cited 3×
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-23· cited 3×
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-29· cited 1×
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-07
- Cobbs v. Bluemercury, Inc.District of Columbia· 2010-10-27
- Mica SAINT-JEAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DefendantDistrict of Columbia· 2014-11-21
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court· 2006-05-30· cited 2,871×
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
- Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityThird Circuit· 2006-07-26· cited 1,198×
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 1,063×
- McKinney v. PateEleventh Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 722×
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-13· cited 605×
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityThird Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 405×
- Stewart, Howard P. v. Ashcroft, JohnD.C. Circuit· 2003-12-23· cited 315×
- Sigsworth v. City Of AuroraSeventh Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 261×
- Freitag v. AyersNinth Circuit· 2006-09-13· cited 242×
- Sydney O. Hall v. Claude A. FordD.C. Circuit· 1988-08-26· cited 219×
- Gleklen v. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 215×
- Lillie R. Battle v. Board of Regents of GAEleventh Circuit· 2006-10-25· cited 204×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.