Skip to main content
· 8/26/1988

Sydney O. Hall v. Claude A. Ford

Citations

  • 856 F.2d 255
  • 272 U.S. App. D.C. 301
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11716
  • 1988 WL 88501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that whether a public university’s “administration [wa]s mismanaging the athletic program” and the “structure of academic and athletic programs” generally were matters of public concern
  • upholding dismissal of athletic director after he repeatedly and publicly disagreed with superiors regarding proper 26 response to violations of university rules
  • finding plaintiff’s work communications that “accused the Chief Judge of having a ‘low level of ethics” and of being “incompetent and ethically challenged” were inappropriate
  • dismissing the plaintiff’s due process claim arising out of the termination of his employment contract on the grounds that “[t]hose who are terminable at will have no property 8 Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 550 (2001
  • an employee who agrees to serve “at the pleasure of’ his employer is an “at will employee with no legitimate expectation of continued employment”
  • a matter of public concern does not \lose its importance merely because it arises in an employee dispute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Silberman, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.