State v. Wimer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The state argued, correctly, that none of the offenses involved the element of a specific criminal intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wimer v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-02-18· cited 18×
• State v. Simpson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-05-28· cited 5×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• State v. Campbell
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-04-26· cited 129×
• State v. Fenley
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-06-08· cited 90×
• State v. Holder
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-05-07· cited 76×
• State v. Horn
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 65×
• State v. O'CAMPO
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-04-13· cited 32×
• Bates v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-03-15· cited 27×
• State v. Ledbetter
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-01-03· cited 21×
• State v. Elisondo
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-04-13· cited 20×
• State v. Huggins
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-09-30· cited 17×
• State v. Mata
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-12-12· cited 13×
• State v. Huggins
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 13×
• State v. Sensenig
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-10-31· cited 12×
• Lehmkuhl v. Bolland
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-16· cited 8×