Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conviction for larceny does not bar prosecution for burglary by breaking and entering with intent to steal because each offense requires proof of facts that other does not: “A uniform doctrine on this point has prevailed, wherever it has been discussed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Grady v. Corbin
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
• State v. Little
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-12-18· cited 83×
• State v. Elder
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1879-05-15· cited 60×
• State v. Benton
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-06-25· cited 55×
• Metz v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1895-12-07· cited 38×
• State v. Hattabough
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1879-05-15· cited 38×
• State v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-11-12· cited 34×
• Moundsville v. Fountain
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1885-11-28· cited 32×
• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1917-11-21· cited 32×
• Edmond v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-06-27· cited 28×
• State v. Fields
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-05-18· cited 22×
• State v. Healy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1917-03-02· cited 22×
• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1882-10-15· cited 22×
• State v. Price
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1905-04-12· cited 19×
• Greer v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1976-05-10· cited 17×
• Triplett v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1886-06-05· cited 17×
• State v. Ingalls
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1896-10-08· cited 16×
• Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Bosworth
  Texas Commission of Appeals· 1925-10-14· cited 15×
• People v. Picaroni
  California Court of Appeal· 1955-03-18· cited 14×
• People v. Parrow
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1890-05-09· cited 14×