Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/8/1896
State v. Ingalls
Citations
- 98 Iowa 728
- 68 N.W. 445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acquittal of larceny is not a bar to prosecution for breaking and entering based upon the same facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deemer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court· 1915-06-01· cited 349×
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-12-19· cited 43×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa· 1924-10-17· cited 22×
- Nagel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1907-10-23· cited 21×
- State v. BroderickSupreme Court of Iowa· 1921-06-21· cited 12×
- In re GanoSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-06-07· cited 7×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1855-07-15· cited 54×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1882-10-15· cited 22×
- State v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court· 1860-08-23· cited 19×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1890-02-10· cited 17×
- State v. WatermanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1893-01-24· cited 14×
- State v. TurneySupreme Court of Iowa· 1889-05-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.