Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 11/5/2010

Wilson v. State

Citations

142 So. 3d 732
2010 WL 4380224
2010 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that facts establishing that the victim was sick, frail, and reliable were relevant to establish the events that led to the discovery of the crime and the victim's body and did not constitute improper victim-impact testimony
holding that facts establishing that the victim was sick, frail, and reliable were relevant to establish the events that led to the discovery of the crime and the victim's body and did not constitute improper victim-impact testimony
noting that, in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court must \accord the State all legitimate inferences\ from the evidence (citations omitted)
especially-heinous-atrocious-or- cruel capital murder committed during a robbery and burglary
especially-heinous-atrocious-or-cruel capital murder committed during a robbery and burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Main, Welch, Windom, Wise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

329 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.