Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 847 N.E.2d 1064
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1001
  • 2006 WL 1452937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain driver after traffic stop was concluded
  • holding officer unreasonably prolonged traffic stop when he finished writing the warning tickets but continued to detain driver to allow police dog to arrive
  • holding that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress where warrant check was completed at 1:58 a.m., warning tickets were written at 2:06 a.m., and canine unit was summoned at 2:15 a.m., only after defendant declined consent to search car
  • holding that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress where warrant check was completed at 1:58 a.m., warning tickets were written at 2:06 a.m., and canine unit was summoned at 2:15 a.m., only after defendant declined consent to search car
  • the warning tickets were written at 2:06 a.m. and the canine unit was summoned at 2:15 a.m., after the defendant declined consent to search the car
  • stop impermissibly lengthened where canine unit was not summoned until nine minutes after warning tickets were written and after defendant had declined consent to search car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.