Skip to main content

Wells v. State

Citations

  • 922 N.E.2d 697
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 344
  • 2010 WL 811297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \there does not appear to be any serious dispute that the length of [defendant]'s traffic stop was substantially lengthened by the call for the K-9 and subsequent dog sniff\
  • “there does not appear to be any serious dispute that the length of [defendant's traffic stop was substantially lengthened by the call for the K-9 and subsequent dog sniff’
  • stop impermissibly lengthened when canine unit was not summoned until after stopping officer obtained all information needed to write ticket and canine did not arrive until nearly twenty minutes after stop could have ended
  • canine unit summoned only after the officer obtained all information needed to write a traffic ticket and the canine unit arrived almost forty minutes into a traffic stop that could have been completed in twenty minutes
  • “Although a dog sniff is not a search, an officer must have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity in order to detain an individual beyond what is necessary to complete a traffic stop related to the reason for that stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Mathias, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.