Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 693 A.2d 344
  • 345 Md. 437
  • 1997 Md. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that trial courts are “vested with a significant amount of discretion” in determining whether to grant a mid-trial continuance, and may consider the convenience of the court, the jury, or witnesses
  • “A court is not ordinarily obliged to continue or interrupt a trial when the defendant has failed to subpoena a witness in a proper and timely manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.