District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/27/2001
Wilson v. State
Citations
- 789 So. 2d 1127
- 2001 WL 716752
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the question of prejudice does not depend on whether the undisclosed evidence might have affected the outcome of the trial, but whether the violation affected the defendant’s ability to prepare
- finding procedural prejudice where State failed to disclose before trial the name of a person who could corroborate the defendant’s alibi defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northcutt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 199×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 83×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 48×
- Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-04· cited 9×
- Staveley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-27· cited 9×
- State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-10-28· cited 6×
- Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-11· cited 5×
- Sackett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.